muz
Golden Master
- Messages
- 6,928
ahh right , no they can be recovered ages after the crash , the FDR from AF flight 447 took nearly two years to recover . But in that case the wreckage was discovered soon after the crash so they had a good idea of where to look . The fear with MH flight 370 is that if they dont find the wreckage soon then it will all get carried its separate ways meaning the search area becomes impossibly big massively reducing the chances of finding the black box .
In terms of the families of the passengers that could have devastating effects because they could never find out what happened . But all of this is also assuming that the plane has gone down over water . There are still people who are saying the plane and its survivors could have landed safely . I dont feel like that is likely but who knows its one big mystery atm which is the worst thing for the families of passengers .
As for Wikipedia , i tend to agree it isn't always the most reliable source . But its not just a free for all . I could go onto an article now edit it with some completely random uncredited false information and it would get removed by the community out there that religiously edit Wikipedia as if it where a full time job to them . Its a kind of peer reviewing but the qualification of the peer reviewer is unchecked . sometimes it works well,with something as clear cut as say the rules of a game it would be good there's no dispute as to what they are . other times like with controversial topics like politics it gets messy .being community based it is also quite hit and miss , articles on some things are very comprehensive and on others are lacking in quality . Reading the numerous different writing styles employed by the numerous people that edit it also doesn't give it a consistent format .
In terms of the families of the passengers that could have devastating effects because they could never find out what happened . But all of this is also assuming that the plane has gone down over water . There are still people who are saying the plane and its survivors could have landed safely . I dont feel like that is likely but who knows its one big mystery atm which is the worst thing for the families of passengers .
As for Wikipedia , i tend to agree it isn't always the most reliable source . But its not just a free for all . I could go onto an article now edit it with some completely random uncredited false information and it would get removed by the community out there that religiously edit Wikipedia as if it where a full time job to them . Its a kind of peer reviewing but the qualification of the peer reviewer is unchecked . sometimes it works well,with something as clear cut as say the rules of a game it would be good there's no dispute as to what they are . other times like with controversial topics like politics it gets messy .being community based it is also quite hit and miss , articles on some things are very comprehensive and on others are lacking in quality . Reading the numerous different writing styles employed by the numerous people that edit it also doesn't give it a consistent format .