HI guys. what do you think about Intel's new Chipset serie?
we now have 4 chipsets released in 2011 (not counting the server chipset)
we have H67: the chipset that can't overclock but use intels integrated GPU.
We have P67: the chipset that can overclock but Can't use the integrated GPU.
we have Z68: the chihpset that can both overclock and use the integrated GPU, and also have the SSD caching technology.
we have X79: a new chipset that can what Z68 can do and supports Quad Channel. it uses the new Sandy bridge Extreme CPU's.
standard sandy bridge architecture but has more Cache memory and some comes with 6 cores. That's the only real difference from the CPU's except the new LGA 2011 sucked.
.... what the fuck is wrong intel??? i understand having the Z68 and the X79.... but WHY the P67 and H67?????
Why call it Sandy bridge E, when it is the exact same thing except that SOME has 6 cores and more Cache?????
Why does X79 not have native USB3 ports???? or just more then 2. (some have more because of 3-party controllers)
we now have 4 chipsets released in 2011 (not counting the server chipset)
we have H67: the chipset that can't overclock but use intels integrated GPU.
We have P67: the chipset that can overclock but Can't use the integrated GPU.
we have Z68: the chihpset that can both overclock and use the integrated GPU, and also have the SSD caching technology.
we have X79: a new chipset that can what Z68 can do and supports Quad Channel. it uses the new Sandy bridge Extreme CPU's.
standard sandy bridge architecture but has more Cache memory and some comes with 6 cores. That's the only real difference from the CPU's except the new LGA 2011 sucked.
.... what the fuck is wrong intel??? i understand having the Z68 and the X79.... but WHY the P67 and H67?????
Why call it Sandy bridge E, when it is the exact same thing except that SOME has 6 cores and more Cache?????
Why does X79 not have native USB3 ports???? or just more then 2. (some have more because of 3-party controllers)