There's probably a simple answer to this question.
So Yahoo mail gives you unlimited storage capacity. I'm wondering where the catch is, as this clearly can't be true as written. Google offers you 16 TB for something like $4,000 a year. So say I'm looking for somewhere to store a couple TB of data, but $4,000 sounds like a lot of money. Why not use yahoo or AOL mail? I realize that they limit the attachment size of each email, but surely it wouldn't be too hard to set up a loop to, say, break up a large data file into 25 MB segments and send each subfile in its own email. Surely there must be some catch here, otherwise google couldn't get away charging $4,000 a year. Any answers?
So Yahoo mail gives you unlimited storage capacity. I'm wondering where the catch is, as this clearly can't be true as written. Google offers you 16 TB for something like $4,000 a year. So say I'm looking for somewhere to store a couple TB of data, but $4,000 sounds like a lot of money. Why not use yahoo or AOL mail? I realize that they limit the attachment size of each email, but surely it wouldn't be too hard to set up a loop to, say, break up a large data file into 25 MB segments and send each subfile in its own email. Surely there must be some catch here, otherwise google couldn't get away charging $4,000 a year. Any answers?