Health care latest: House debating Republican objections

If we have any kind of limit like that, how is it a democracy? That'd just cause more issues.

It would be a democracy because we would still vote who took that seat.
For example, people would vote for the best republican if it was a republican seat and vice versa if it were a democratic seat. We have a constant amount for the president (one) and vice president (one) madam speaker (one). Why not a constant amount for the house and senate?
 
That is simply not true, on the health care bill individuals from both parties voted no. Denying a bill or passing a bill; they are both getting something done. Only bills that benefit both parties aka all of America will pass. With a leading majority like it is now, only 50 percent of Americans will approve of the bill.
(Given that and if Americans are split equally 50/50)

Bipartisanship my friend, bipartisanship.

The voting isn't exactly that close. The democrats seem to have a good job if they fooled you. Look at the democrats who voted against the bill. They're in very republican-friendly congressional districts, this year is election year. There is a reason they voted no. They want to keep their seats in the house. That's the same reason why some republicans may have abstained from voting yes. America works when people aren't afraid of speaking out their mind, and right now, that's not the case.
 
Back
Top Bottom