foothead Omnicide now. Messages 10,027 Location My own personal hell Mar 20, 2010 #12 Holysky said: no.... The 5870 beats the gtx285 in every test known to man. Click to expand... except folding@home PPD. until GPU3 client is relesed
Holysky said: no.... The 5870 beats the gtx285 in every test known to man. Click to expand... except folding@home PPD. until GPU3 client is relesed
sniperviper21 Golden Master Messages 5,460 Location USA Mar 20, 2010 #13 so wtf is so special about gpu3?
foothead Omnicide now. Messages 10,027 Location My own personal hell Mar 20, 2010 #14 It adds openCL support. BTW, a 295 beats a 5870 in pretty much everything at stock clocks.
sniperviper21 Golden Master Messages 5,460 Location USA Mar 20, 2010 #15 foothead said: It adds openCL support. BTW, a 295 beats a 5870 in pretty much everything at stock clocks. Click to expand... not by a whole lot you know. an how much would openCL help anyways
foothead said: It adds openCL support. BTW, a 295 beats a 5870 in pretty much everything at stock clocks. Click to expand... not by a whole lot you know. an how much would openCL help anyways
Holysky Fully Optimized Messages 3,692 Mar 20, 2010 #16 but a gtx 295 is 2 gpus the 5870 is one runs cooler less energy needed 45nm and cheaper and if you oc it beats a 295
but a gtx 295 is 2 gpus the 5870 is one runs cooler less energy needed 45nm and cheaper and if you oc it beats a 295
foothead Omnicide now. Messages 10,027 Location My own personal hell Mar 20, 2010 #17 To put it the simplest way possible, OpenCL will basically equal CUDA in folding performance. That is, once it is refined a bit. Holysky said: but a gtx 295 is 2 gpus the 5870 is one runs cooler less energy needed 45nm and cheaper and if you oc it beats a 295 Click to expand... BUT we are talking raw benches here.
To put it the simplest way possible, OpenCL will basically equal CUDA in folding performance. That is, once it is refined a bit. Holysky said: but a gtx 295 is 2 gpus the 5870 is one runs cooler less energy needed 45nm and cheaper and if you oc it beats a 295 Click to expand... BUT we are talking raw benches here.
Holysky Fully Optimized Messages 3,692 Mar 20, 2010 #18 BUT not everyone has a ton of money to throw out on their favorite brand, why not spend 200 dollars less OC and get equivalent performance and being more realistic.
BUT not everyone has a ton of money to throw out on their favorite brand, why not spend 200 dollars less OC and get equivalent performance and being more realistic.
sniperviper21 Golden Master Messages 5,460 Location USA Mar 20, 2010 #19 foothead said: To put it the simplest way possible, OpenCL will basically equal CUDA in folding performance. That is, once it is refined a bit. BUT we are talking raw benches here. Click to expand... still a Vidia fan to me lol. and i dont count 4fps faster here, and there, consider to be better.
foothead said: To put it the simplest way possible, OpenCL will basically equal CUDA in folding performance. That is, once it is refined a bit. BUT we are talking raw benches here. Click to expand... still a Vidia fan to me lol. and i dont count 4fps faster here, and there, consider to be better.
foothead Omnicide now. Messages 10,027 Location My own personal hell Mar 20, 2010 #20 We were just talking what is faster, not what is better for your money, etc. There is a huge difference.
We were just talking what is faster, not what is better for your money, etc. There is a huge difference.