Äߧý∩†H♠H䎀;1002546 said:
I own both a Desktop PC and a MacBook Pro. I honestly use my MacBook Pro more now that I've got a Mini Display port to DVI adapter and a blue tooth keyboard/magic mouse combo.
The main reason I bought a Mac was because I wanted to develop applications for the iPhone. Try doing that on a PC. O wait you can't because you need OSX to do it. ... I also run a dual boot with Windows Vista installed through there bootcamp. Another thing Mac does that Windows doesn't (Legally) & without tons of compatibility issues.
you can dual boot a PC running MAC OS, you can use a VM to run Mac OS inside of windows. you've pretty much ALWAYS been able to do this, even before macs started using intel. -I know, I've done it.
so you can design Iphone apps without the need to buy a mac.
legality is a weird one. it's perfectly possible to buy a license for OSX, but then apple restrict what hardware you;re allowed to use it on. (just like apple restrict what apps you can put onto the iphone -unless you go against their EULA for the device/OS etc and jail break.
basically the reason that you can't legally put Mac OSX on a PC is because Apple say so, practically the only reason for doing this is that if you were allowed to put OSX onto any hardware apple would practically fold overnight.
(basically apple make their money on the hardware, not on the software).
The construction is second to none. All aluminum case with a magnetized screen for shutting it as well as a magnetized power connecter & everything is just so seamless. Not to mention the gorgeous LED screen.
I do really like the power connector...
I mean they could have put a simple plug like you find on every other laptop in the land, but th little magnetised plug is cool.
If you want to complain about price so be it. I admit they are more than a comparable PC. But when my MBP boots about 5-6 seconds faster than my superior desktop that says something. That's 5400rpm HDD vs 7200rpm HDD, c2d 2.16Ghz vs 3.2Ghz, DDR3 1066Mhz vs PC DDR2 1066Mhz.
it says you need a stripped out version of BSD on your desktop to compare properly.
comparing windows boot time to MacOSX boot time is comparing apples to pears, different processes are starting, different UI component are starting. I'd also hazard a guess that you'll have a bunch of third party tools starting up as services or in the background at boot on the windows machine that just aren't on the Mac?
Don't like Mac well that sucks for you because your really missing out. How many of the members here criticizing apple have used the latest offerings from Apple?
have you used the latest offerings from winows, (as in windows 7, have you used the latest [insert linux distro here] offering from [insert vendor here]... so how are you making the opinion that Macs are best..? -you're criticising an entire hardware platform from multiple vendors when you clearly haven't tried all possible operating systems, but then you say for a person that just says they don't like Macs based on their experience, they are wrong??
FYI I have used OSX, but not version 10.6, to be honest I found the whole experience a lot like going back to an earlier version of Linux, (think redhat 8 or redhat 9) in look and feel, I'm not just saying that, it honestly was like going back a decade. all the tools are ripped from linux -and still looked the same, to do anything meaningful I kept finding I was dropping into the system prompt and issuing commands. -though this was in the course of supporting Macs.
And if you haven't used a Mac compare it to using an iPhone for the first time. There just on another level much like Ford vs BMW are on 2 different levels.
I finally got used to my iphone, and finally like it.
however, I still recognise it's problems, (of which there are many). but over all I like the package and the device wins out purely on screen size over the windows mobile (HTC Touch Pro) that I got at the same time... thus the touch pro has replaced my cheap nokia work phone, and my iphone has become my phone, (I was posting in this thread earlier from the phone.
I think that the comparison (if using cars) would be ford/nissan. they are essentially almost the same company producing the same cars, they just look a little different, but function in much the same way.