RhysAndrews
In Runtime
- Messages
- 321
Hey guys,
My brother was a rep @ a hi-fi store, and so he knows his stuff about TVs, Audio, Home Theatre, etc. I'm a massive computer geek, and I know my stuff about computers - and I know that computers and home theatre / tvs / audio are becoming one very quickly, what with HTPC's, etc.
However, we got in a little argument yesterday about CD players. He said he got a "Music Server" from work to play with yesterday.. retailing at $3,500. All it does is rip music to a hard-drive while it plays, so you don't need to put the CD in again. It sounded cool for someone who wanted it, but when he mentioned the price tag I lol'd. He thinks that the audio will play much higher quality out of such a device than a regular CD/DVD drive on a computer (not putting into consideration the sound card or speakers - he means the drive itself makes a huge difference). He points to the laser, saying that a higher quality laser picks up more sound.
Now, I don't understand this when CDs are digital. If a CD cannot pickup all the bits in a track, surely it corrups a track? When you rip a CD, doesn't it just copy all the tracks bit by bit, and then compress to MP3 or WMA or whatever? What is the point in spending $3,500 on a 'high quality' CD player that records to a hard-disk when you can get a computer which does the same thing for $500, and more?
I also don't see how say a higher-quality HDMI cable is going to make a difference, considering it's just sending the colour information for each pixel. If it was sending wavelengths it would be different, but its not. It's sending raw data.
My brother was a rep @ a hi-fi store, and so he knows his stuff about TVs, Audio, Home Theatre, etc. I'm a massive computer geek, and I know my stuff about computers - and I know that computers and home theatre / tvs / audio are becoming one very quickly, what with HTPC's, etc.
However, we got in a little argument yesterday about CD players. He said he got a "Music Server" from work to play with yesterday.. retailing at $3,500. All it does is rip music to a hard-drive while it plays, so you don't need to put the CD in again. It sounded cool for someone who wanted it, but when he mentioned the price tag I lol'd. He thinks that the audio will play much higher quality out of such a device than a regular CD/DVD drive on a computer (not putting into consideration the sound card or speakers - he means the drive itself makes a huge difference). He points to the laser, saying that a higher quality laser picks up more sound.
Now, I don't understand this when CDs are digital. If a CD cannot pickup all the bits in a track, surely it corrups a track? When you rip a CD, doesn't it just copy all the tracks bit by bit, and then compress to MP3 or WMA or whatever? What is the point in spending $3,500 on a 'high quality' CD player that records to a hard-disk when you can get a computer which does the same thing for $500, and more?
I also don't see how say a higher-quality HDMI cable is going to make a difference, considering it's just sending the colour information for each pixel. If it was sending wavelengths it would be different, but its not. It's sending raw data.