I downloaded ubuntu live CD through ftp. I found that the iso file was corrupt (MD5 sum do not match). I heard several advices that I should have used a torrent. Torrent is highly reliable because it does checksums in every part of the file it downloads.
Does it mean that torrent is better than ftp?
Doesn't ftp do checksums?
I hope that ftp should have some options by which I can make ftp to do checksums in every part of a file it downloads and make the download as reliable as it is done by a torrent. Can you tell me how to do this?
Does it mean that torrent is better than ftp?
Doesn't ftp do checksums?
I hope that ftp should have some options by which I can make ftp to do checksums in every part of a file it downloads and make the download as reliable as it is done by a torrent. Can you tell me how to do this?