A True Folder
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 2,789
Well, having spent the best part of this morning reading up on the differences between the two (more like gathering info on Real Temp) it appears that Core temp may have been using a erroneous TjMax as its reference point which results in higher temperature readings.
I was doing this because Core Temp had my E3110 idling in the low 40°C range at stock which I couldn't see being correct as the lower volted 45nm cpus are supposed to be more efficient/run cooler than the 65nm models. So off i went in search of information, the result was a morning spent reading a hell of a lot of forum posts and some very interesting test results.
Over at XS forums unclewebb has put a lot of effort and research into Real Temp and I'm leaning toward it being the more accurate of the monitors currently available.
Have a read and d/load it here
Cheers.
EDIT: Supports "some" P4's, all Intel duals and quads afaik
I was doing this because Core Temp had my E3110 idling in the low 40°C range at stock which I couldn't see being correct as the lower volted 45nm cpus are supposed to be more efficient/run cooler than the 65nm models. So off i went in search of information, the result was a morning spent reading a hell of a lot of forum posts and some very interesting test results.
Over at XS forums unclewebb has put a lot of effort and research into Real Temp and I'm leaning toward it being the more accurate of the monitors currently available.
Have a read and d/load it here
Cheers.
EDIT: Supports "some" P4's, all Intel duals and quads afaik