Äߧý∩†H♠H䎀
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 3,629
Hey I was helping someone on the forum overclock there E6750 and after doing some numbers as we were going I realized a E6750 is a E6600 if that makes any sense.
E6750 clocks at 2.66Ghz with a 1333FSB
E6600 clocks at 2.4Ghz with a 1066FSB
Difference E6600 uses a 9x multi were the E6750 uses a 8x multi.
So essentially if I drop a E6600 multi to 8x and set the FSB at 1333 I get 2.66Ghz the same as the E6750.
So i'm wondering to myself would it be smarter to recommend E6600's over E6750's? Because you get a better multiplier for a higher possible clock vs FSB and then you can run it at 8x and see were it could clock as a E6750.
Am I missing something here. The only thing I could see as being different is the newer steppings.
E6750 clocks at 2.66Ghz with a 1333FSB
E6600 clocks at 2.4Ghz with a 1066FSB
Difference E6600 uses a 9x multi were the E6750 uses a 8x multi.
So essentially if I drop a E6600 multi to 8x and set the FSB at 1333 I get 2.66Ghz the same as the E6750.
So i'm wondering to myself would it be smarter to recommend E6600's over E6750's? Because you get a better multiplier for a higher possible clock vs FSB and then you can run it at 8x and see were it could clock as a E6750.
Am I missing something here. The only thing I could see as being different is the newer steppings.