every vid card ranked. well...most.

[joe pic]

#25!

 

[ownage]

Yeah, but on that list it says X2800XTX...there's no such thing...

Think again http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video/display/20070520232515.html

 

[freestyler105]

No, in that article it says X2800XTX. There is no such thing. There may be an X2900XTX coming out, but I have heard nothing of an X2800XTX.

 

[aCb]

http://www.techspot.com/news/24379-radeon-x2800xtx-clock-speed-information.html

 

[freestyler105]

http://www.techspot.com/news/24379-radeon-x2800xtx-clock-speed-information.html

That's irrelevant, it's old. I'm pretty sure they're talking about the X2900XTX there anyway.

 

[CrackerJacker1]

so yeah there is such a thing. its not out to the public, but it is out there!

 

[lhuser]

I have a couple of cards who are the before last and last.

Although, I have no clue how the heck my 9600Pro gets owned by a 9500Pro. Something isn't right. The X1600Pro doesn't beat a 7300GT. That's not true. The X1600Pro owns the 7300GT AFAIK.

 

[freestyler105]

This is a much more accurate page:
http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics.html

And yeah, the X1600 Pro is much better than the 7300GT.

 

[THEpiGUY]

Although, I have no clue how the heck my 9600Pro gets owned by a 9500Pro. Something isn't right. The X1600Pro doesn't beat a 7300GT. That's not true. The X1600Pro owns the 7300GT AFAIK.

The 9500Pro is actually probably the better card. It has twice the pixel pipelines and texture units, with a little higher than half the core clock @ stock. The difference would hardly be noticeable going from one to the other.

As for the 1600Pro/7300GT battle, that one really is strange... I'm going to have to agree with you there.

 

[allenn812]

3rd! They shouldn't have the HD2900xtx on there, it hasn't been released yet. And if any of the benchies are right, its not better than a 8800gtx.