22" Monitor

[freestyler105]

That does look good, 2ms response, 2000:1 contrast ratio...can't find any reviews on it though.

 

[ownage]

The 16ms response time is kind of turning me off...the 22" monitor I use has a 5ms response time. And it's $360, that's a lot.

I'm actually looking at this now:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001088
Seems like a really good one for the price. Not huge, but I don't need it to be, that's what my 22" is for.

[sarcasm] Okay, then go out and buy a 2ms refresh rate monitor and you will have the sharpest images ever! [/sarcasm]

No really, response time should be the least of your worries. I can almost guarantee you right now that your 5ms refresh rate is g-g (gray to gray), not b-w (black to white). All 22" monitors use TN panels instead of the higher quality S-IPS and MVA panels. The 2007WFP uses S-IPS and MVA panels for sure. For more info on different panels, read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-IPS

 

[freestyler105]

[sarcasm] Okay, then go out and buy a 2ms refresh rate monitor and you will have the sharpest images ever! [/sarcasm]

No really, response time should be the least of your worries. I can almost guarantee you right now that your 5ms refresh rate is g-g (gray to gray), not b-w (black to white). All 22" monitors use TN panels instead of the higher quality S-IPS and MVA panels. The 2007WFP uses S-IPS and MVA panels for sure. For more info on different panels, read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-IPS

Haha, okay, you got me there. I'll look into that later.

 

[Taylor1]

a Dell 20.1" 2007WFP looks a ton better than any 22" screen. Since they use different panels. The Ultrasharp monitors use higher quality panels compared to the 22" monitors.

i totally agree. My dad has the dell ultrasharp widescreen 20" i have a normal 19"
and i drool over the 20"
and i drool over the dvi instead of my vga.