LambOfGod Fully Optimized Messages 1,783 Jan 23, 2007 #11 cabbspapp said: Wait, do you have a Sempron 3400+? Then that's not 3.4 Ghz, it's the name of the processor. Click to expand... thats probally what he meant lol
cabbspapp said: Wait, do you have a Sempron 3400+? Then that's not 3.4 Ghz, it's the name of the processor. Click to expand... thats probally what he meant lol
Cabbs Golden Master Messages 7,912 Jan 23, 2007 #12 Aren't Semprons basically watered-down Athlons? The only difference I can be sure of is their extremely tiny cache.
Aren't Semprons basically watered-down Athlons? The only difference I can be sure of is their extremely tiny cache.
LambOfGod Fully Optimized Messages 1,783 Jan 23, 2007 #13 cabbspapp said: Aren't Semprons basically watered-down Athlons? The only difference I can be sure of is their extremely tiny cache. Click to expand... the first semprons where based on the Athlon XP (socket A thoroughbred core) then they went to the athlon 64 (socket 754 Paris/Palermo core ) they have reduced caches and in some cases lacking addition CPU instructions/ support
cabbspapp said: Aren't Semprons basically watered-down Athlons? The only difference I can be sure of is their extremely tiny cache. Click to expand... the first semprons where based on the Athlon XP (socket A thoroughbred core) then they went to the athlon 64 (socket 754 Paris/Palermo core ) they have reduced caches and in some cases lacking addition CPU instructions/ support
