Basic Info. I am testing this thing for now. I'd consider it a confirmation for Windows, bu if it fails, I'm doomed. Also, If I want to, I could set it to 4096...so that's a bobo not to do.
So.. You were just proved wrong. We all were. We were told that it would make it run faster, and we beleived it. And thought it really happened. Now we all know better.
So.. You were just proved wrong. We all were. We were told that it would make it run faster, and we beleived it. And thought it really happened. Now we all know better.
And those who say it's faster, any brenchmarks? Maybe before I pass out tonight, I'll give it a wirl and check with superpi
*tested*
OMG! Like, I changed it, and it's so much faster... Actually, I got 39 seconds both times Suprise suprise... I have 1MB cache, so if it was disabled, I should notice a pretty big difference. I mean 256k and 1024k's a pretty large difference.
Hey mr. knoe it all. why did you put 256k, its 256KB!!!
Im not going to make chnage your l2, if you wish to give it a try than give it a try its not damaging. or if you want belive mr.I want to be right all the time than belive him im not stoping you
ok ladys. I have a AMD 3700 @ 2.7ghz and i did this L2 Cach Tweak and it worked for me. My PC boots up in know time flat. I put in 1024kbs Becasue thats my L2 and it works. Nothing wrong went for me. So people who are saying bad stuff about x800's tweak.... well you dont know anything about computers. It works and were glad he put it up here. Thanks again X800