AMD Dethrowned. Intel Steps up.

[MooseMan1]

i donno why u seem 2 be trying 2 find excuses to try and get us agenst conroe quinton, or it least it seems that way

 

[NeXuS1]

hes trying to say dont get to excited it is still in development

 

[MooseMan1]

ok, well it just seems that he's afraid of intel stepping ^ and people possibly moving 2 intels side but thats just my opinion

 

[G9]

Eh, it'll probably be another Crossifre x1900xtx vs. 7900gtx moments... ATI's crossfire system with the x1900xtx is the big boom, then suddenly the faster 7900GTX's come in with QUAD SLI.

AMD will probably kick in something and destroy Intel once more, but I believe they will always have the edge in Mobile processors.

 

[NeXuS1]

bah Quad SLI is a waste of money thats the only way NVDIA can beat the X1900XTX and it doesent beat it by a lot hahaha

 

[G9]

Yeah, I must agree with you there... so is the x1900xtx really more powerful than the 7900GTX?

 

[NeXuS1]

Yea you didnt know??? hold on let me scoop up the benchmarks and quad SLI doesent beat the crossfire X1900XTX's by much funny

 

[G9]

I checked out anandtech... x1900xtx has better performance, but the 7900GTX is more efficient, runs cooler... and the SLI is better than the Crossfire system. So when you're sticking in more than one card, NVIDIA's GTX is the way to go.

 

[NeXuS1]

here it is
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/03/09/ati_and_nvidias_same_day_mega_launch_mayhem/page11.html

 

[G9]

It was usually that the ATI Crossfire was better at higher resolutions...

...I honestly don't know. They were pretty equalled out, as there were inconsistencies in the winners.