userjs6998
Baseband Member
- Messages
- 94
I still like AMD better.
Quinton McLeod said:
Well, it appears as though the Presler isn't as good as everyone thought.
So far, it has a higher L2 cache, faster clock speed, Quad FSB Doubler, smaller 65nm process....Mmm... That's about it. But, even with all of this, it can barely beat the X2 4800+! As a matter of fact, the X2 4800 is still in the lead and it's a 90nm process.
It took Intel this long just to match up with the X2 4800+, and we haven't even talked about AMD's new FX-60 and X2 5000+ processors yet.
I'm sorry, but Intel is getting close, but not there yet.
SpadeXL said:well the FX-60 is a joke. Intel will be using GDDR3 Ram not DDr2 will be on the 65nm and have there new socket. The X2 although a good chip wont be considered for the hardcore gamer ever when the 5200+ come. Since FX is now Dual core that is AMDs money maker in the future. withthe FX-62 and 64. and the AM2 socket.
Conroe with 4mb cache and GDDR3 System memory is something NO ONE not even AMD should brush off cause it may bite them in the ass.
"So far, it has a higher L2 cache, faster clock speed, Quad FSB Doubler, smaller 65nm process....Mmm... That's about it."
What are you on???????? Thats just it? that is a total new generation of chips. What else do you think there is to improve in a chip? Unless it comes with a gold tw@t to bang that is as good an upgrade as you can get. What you should be asking is WTF did AMD do to the FX-60 which is a big pile of steamy crap