what is ur iq

[01001010]

but didnt ur name used to be ACDC Rox?

Yes, it did.

 

[Half Evil]

That explains why i never liked ACDC Rox.. lol..^_^

 

[alvino]

I alternated the "True" and "False" and I got: 95 (hey, I'm bored, okay?)

 

[DJ Stephen]

im about to take it at 7:38 GMT -00:00. Ill post the results later.

 

[root]

My IQ is 140...

which means I'm some 16 points lower than when I last took a test...
having said that I must have just gotten older, but not any wiser... (IQ tests are scored in relation to age).
but still above average...

my iq (a serious government test) was 182

I reckon that's bull...

sorry... I just don't believe it...

Einstiens IQ was only just above 160!!!

Descriptive Classifications of Intelligence Quotients

IQ Description % of Population
130+ Very superior 2.2%
120-129 Superior 6.7%
110-119 High average 16.1%
90-109 Average 50%
80-89 Low average 16.1%
70-79 Borderline 6.7%
Below 70 Extremely low 2.2%

I once read a much better interperation of the results that said blow 30 was profoundly retarded

Apparently, the IQ gives a good indication of the occupational group that a person will end up in, though not of course the specific occupation. In their book, Know Your Child's IQ, Glen Wilson and Diana Grylls outline occupations typical of various IQ levels:

140 Top Civil Servants; Professors and Research Scientists.
130 Physicians and Surgeons; Lawyers; Engineers (Civil and Mechanical)
120 School Teachers; Pharmacists; Accountants; Nurses; Stenographers; Managers.
110 Foremen; Clerks; Telephone Operators; Salesmen; Policemen; Electricians.
100+ Machine Operators; Shopkeepers; Butchers; Welders; Sheet Metal Workers.
100- Warehousemen; Carpenters; Cooks and Bakers; Small Farmers; Truck and Van Drivers.
90 Laborers; Gardeners; Upholsterers; Farmhands; Miners; Factory Packers and Sorters.

http://iq-test.learninginfo.org/iq04.htm


We can't all be in the top 1%


Besides...

 

[Paradox1]

Lol I thought 180 sounded high, Brb, I'll go check wikipedia. Wikipedias never let me down before lol

Edit: Ok, I know nothing about IQs but this is what wikipedia had to say.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ

IQ Range Frequency Cumulative Frequency


Below 30 <1% <1% below 30


30 to 50 <1%? <1% below 50


50 to 60 ~1%? 1.5% below 60


60 to 74 3.5%? 5% below 74


74 to 89 20% 25% below 89


89 to 100 25% 50% below 100


100 to 111 50% 1 in 2 above 100


111 to 120 15% 1 in 4 above 111


120 to 125 5% 1 in 10 above 120


125 to 132 3% 1 in 20 above 125


132 to 137 1% 1 in 50 above 132


137 to 150 0.9% 1 in 100 above 137


above 150 0.1% 1 in 1,100 above 150


How Do we have 2 people with IQs above Einsteins?

 

[Natalya1]

mine was 138

 

[jac006]

My IQ is 140...

which means I'm some 16 points lower than when I last took a test...
having said that I must have just gotten older, but not any wiser... (IQ tests are scored in relation to age).
but still above average...



I reckon that's bull...

sorry... I just don't believe it...

Einstiens IQ was only just above 160!!!


I once read a much better interperation of the results that said blow 30 was profoundly retarded


http://iq-test.learninginfo.org/iq04.htm


We can't all be in the top 1%


Besides...

I'm sorry, but it's true. I don't if that internet iq test is legit man. I took one when I was in GATE and they said my I.Q. was 180. I'm sorry, but if you don't believe it, then, well, that's your loss. I'm not the smartest guy on the block, but I can figure things out pretty quickly. How can you say that Einstien's i.q. was just above 160 when we don't really know what it really was. It was roughly that of around 180-200. But we don't know. Again, this was one that a school administered to me. It was in the 6th grade, and I had taken a high school i.q. test. It's just me. I'm not lying, if you think I am, so be it. Maybe the numbers have changed... again, that's my results...

 

[root]

RE Voodoo childs spamming...

Voodoo Child, Joined: July 30th 2005, Posts: 999, Posts per day: 6.84

SetShock, Joined: February 2nd 2005, Posts: 2760, Posts per day: 8.52
Paradox, Joined: June 28th 2005, Posts: 2321, Posts per day:13.04
Alvino, Joined:September 6th 2004, Posts:7974, Posts per day:16.86
Sk8ngame, Joined:November 9th 2005, Posts: 367, Posts per day: 8.29
Jac006, Joined: October 8th 2004, Posts: 4655, Posts per day:10.55
arrizx, Joined:April 26th 2005, Posts:2323, Posts per day:9.63
Paradox, Joined: August 28th 2005, Posts:1170, Posts per day:10.04

All of you (complaining about Voodoo Childs posts) have aquired more posts in less time than he has...
All of you have started threads in here.
All of you have joined in the game threads.

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones...

You've all (in your time here) had one of two pointless posts, so don't start getting on Voodoo Childs case just because he'd making a few at the moment...

That said. it's quality over quantity voodoo child, there's no point in making all of these posts and threads if it's making people pissed off at you, perhaps a few less meainless threads, and a few more quality posts would be great? try breaking out of the social lounge and giing some advice in some of the other parts of the forum?


and in case you're all wondering...
root, Joined:March 29th 2004, Posts:2366, Posts per day:3.73

 

[Paradox1]

Why am I up there twice?

And the reason he has so little posts a day is because he'll leave and come back, but everytime he comes back he goes on a spamming spree. You can't look at records and tell who spams and who doesn't.