TRDCorolla said:As you all know, Apple has dumped IBM's PowerPC processors in favor of the Intel engine. Could a PC actually load Mac OS X? Steve Jobs don't want to. Could an Apple run Windows? He said, it's possible but he's not going to promote it. The "hybrid" of both will be coming soon. I can see Jobs big grin on his face.
Apple will finally get the power boost they need with Intel. Apple has always struggled to match the chip speed of it's Intel based Windows competitors and now, Apple will no longer have to cope with this issue. Now the war is officially on. Apple vs Microsoft war is heating up. Apple's newest OS X (Leopard) is coming out almost the same time Vista's coming out and they will all be able to run on the same Intel compatible processors. How do you like that? Things just got a bit more interesting...
Redspade said:Incorrect. Apple have always ran faster then PC's and WAY more stable. 128bit vs 32 bit. I mean you cant compaire them lol Risk>Sisk BIG TIME.
alvino said:Too bad for IBM. They own Intel. For one, they're 128bit not 32bit and their multi-core processors aren't two crappy cores slaved with a logics processor.
Redspade said:Incorrect. Apple have always ran faster then PC's and WAY more stable. 128bit vs 32 bit. I mean you cant compaire them lol Risk>Sisk BIG TIME.
Delta said:Man that was fantastic! You even thought about stand up comedy? your comic talents are wasted on these boards!!
Originally Posted by Redspade
Incorrect. Apple have always ran faster then PC's and WAY more stable. 128bit vs 32 bit. I mean you cant compaire them lol Risk>Sisk BIG TIME.
So Apple took a downgrade last year? Going from the 128-bit G4 to the 64-bit G5? Oh and Sisk, thats Simplistic Instuction Set Kompootaa right? Moron!
Originally Posted by alvino
Too bad for IBM. They own Intel. For one, they're 128bit not 32bit and their multi-core processors aren't two crappy cores slaved with a logics processor.
Im pissing myself here, you guys need to do a double act