only 7000 3dmarkd 05 x1800xt ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

tsh

Baseband Member
Messages
89
I get only 7000 in 3dmark 05 and games run slow then they should with my x1800xt

i dont know what the issue is and im almost postive no one here can help.. seeing how i posted this all over the web and no one has


But i can only get around 7600 in 3dmark when i should be getting easy 8000 and up


I have a dell xps 3 system

3.6ghzintel cpu with ht

2gs ram 533mhz dual channel ddr2

xfi sound card



CPU

http://www.badongo.com/pic.php?file...Picture+004.jpg



here is a pic of my card


http://www.badongo.com/pic.php?file...Picture+018.jpg




http://www.badongo.com/pic.php?file...Picture+015.jpg


3dmarkd05 fps

http://www.badongo.com/pic.php?file...Picture+016.jpg




Mem info

http://www.badongo.com/pic.php?file...Picture+012.jpg


general computer


http://img54.imageshack.us/my.php?i...cture0141hv.jpg



mother board (ill i know)

http://img483.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture4pt.jpg


Anyone can help i really need it


edit: running 5.11 drivers and i have leastest everything else
 
yes.. but it shouldnt kill proformance that badly


and it shouldnt be that much of a difference
 
Hmm, I'm not exactly quite sure, but I can relate. My system should be getting higher FPS on games like BF2 and better on 3DMark05 but it isn't.
 
It is cause you got ATI :p j/k

Kuberr said:
Intel doesn't do well with gaming.

*Cough* What? Sorry to say but the benchmark tests between AMD and Intel are quite close and intel Muilt Task better :p. On the top end you really aint gonna notice it as a gamer. Even more so with 2 gigs of ram and an X1800XT. (Human eye can only see what 22 frames per second not even?)

Are you using ATI drivers? I always found Third Party ATI drivers to be better then what ATI can actually make on there own so give that a try.
 
Redspade said:
*Cough* What? Sorry to say but the benchmark tests between AMD and Intel are quite close and intel Muilt Task better :p. On the top end you really aint gonna notice it as a gamer. (Human eye can only see what 22 frames per second not even?)

ahahha, yes i am, Infact, laughing at you. (^_^), people like you alway make me laugh, its something to do wiht stupidity that I find so funny.
 
The_Necromancer said:
ahahha, yes i am, Infact, laughing at you. (^_^), people like you alway make me laugh, its something to do wiht stupidity that I find so funny.

aye just like when I giggle at your complete ignorance.(It's not as complete as yours, Redspade) I mean wow bro. I cant believe your parents let you even play on a computer let alone stay up past your bed time to post this useless rant :p You aint tuff bro this is a forum. Grow up!! Please PMS elsewhere.
 
The_Necromancer said:
OK, well Let me tke down your argument systematically then, But first what specific CPU does he have?

560? or 660?

Ohh wait it does not matter...


Single core? ROFLMAO learn to upgrade man. I am on Dual core. Hit me back when you can even compete. (Blah blah nothing using muilt threaing yet blah blah. Still muilt tasks way better then your single core which is my whole point to begin with) and anandtech will back that up and so does tomshardware.com.) so again you are up way past your bed time man. Time out for you again? Go sit in the corner bro lol. Conversation over.
 
Sorry, It was a typo i was asking what His (Tsh) cpu was, and as you can see, the only benchmark his CPU wins is the sys2004 benchmarks, now as for your CPU what is is?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom