Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
An AMD?
I still have a Celeron 333Mhz working downstairs, with 86Megs of RAM and Windows 2000
I still have a Celeron 333Mhz working downstairs, with 86Megs of RAM and Windows 2000
Lord Kalthorn said:70%? Define 64-bit? Lol. Any Pentium 4 you buy today new for say... more than a hundred pounds, most 5xxs, any 6xx, any Pentium D, Xeon for more than £200 and any Itanium, will be 64-bit. As far as I am aware all Dell PCs with 5xx, 6xx and so forth are 64-bit; which is a huge bunch of people buying them. Perhaps that is 70%... I'm not sure. But I am sure that within 4 months of selling some 5xxs with EM64T, Intel outsold AMD's almost 15 months, selling 64-bit Processors as their whole topend range, in 64-bit Processors. So if indeed it is 70%, thats only because Intel sell such a huge range of Processors, for such a wide range of prices, to such a wide range of people, not all of whom even know what 64-bit means, very few of which would ever need it. Eitherway however, Pentium D is not the only 64-bit certainty
Do they sell good at the moment?
Because they give far superior Multitasking performance and thrash AMD in 3DMark 05 and PCMark 04. I don't have the statistics to prove AMd sell a huge range of CPUs now, an certainly not 15 months ago. I didn't even say they did You did, you find the statisticsjac006 said:Yeah, but why would you buy an intel today? I wouldn't touch them, no offense. But I used an intel for 8 years and my amd for 3 years and my amd outperform's anything I've ever seen or used. Amd sells are huge range of cpu's too. Do you have and statistics to support that 15 months thing?