David Lindon
Golden Master
- Messages
- 15,233
Looks good
You don't even have a right to talk. You don't know anything. You are proven wrong constantly, but you're too dumb to even notice.Giancarlo said:Maybe you are the one who should get your own opinions checked out. You are the one who should learn something. Don't go around insulting people when they have said nothing to you. Damn Intel fan boys.
Giancarlo said:Maybe you are the one who should get your own opinions checked out. You are the one who should learn something. Don't go around insulting people when they have said nothing to you. Damn Intel fan boys.
SSE4 said:You make it sound like I don't know any of this. Oh, and the 6xx series is not very good. The NetBurst architecture is no match for the AMD64, that's simple fact. Look out, if you say Intel is good for heavy multitasking (Due to Hyper-Threading) they'll call you names as well.
Intels offer a seamless environment for normal office work and many other applications, whereas AMDs are unbeatable in gaming and other heavy (single-threaded) applications. You say nothing I don't know, it's just when I say it I'm a fanboy. They're both good processors depending on the user. And the Smithfield, is not very good and it is not meant to "win" the multi-core market, it was just released quickly so that Intel could say they had it first, and maybe grab a few sales until AMD came out with the X2.
No, we can't control it. And therefore I acknowledge both and just state facts. They however, don't.