Gasoline Prices

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lord Kalthorn said:
Clean does not mean not our problem :D How can something that is dangerous for thousands of years be clean? If we cancel everything out of our reach for now; we're not going to get anywhere... Tocomac Power isn't even that out of our reach. The Program I saw that talked about it, talked about it over 5 years ago - they talked of it running for long enough to create more power than it used; and then to go on to continuously pump out enough to power a large town. It went on for just less than a minute. The program specifically about it is 10 years old now - they had it up for 3 seconds at the time. I'd like to know what is happening with it now but its no where to be found.

Can you stop speaking out of your ass and actually provide some sources to what you say? It would be most helpful to me because I have no idea what you are talking about. You may be speaking out of thin air. Thanks.

Hydrogen Cars are Electric Cars; Hydrogen is merely the fuel which allows the Electric Car to not have to have a huge battery and recharge every few metres. A Lighter produces a great deal more heat than is ever going to happen on any journey in a Car.

Going by this argument, gasoline cars are electric cars too. But that's merely bullshit.
 
Giancarlo said:
Can you stop speaking out of your ass and actually provide some sources to what you say? It would be most helpful to me because I have no idea what you are talking about. You may be speaking out of thin air. Thanks.
Haha! Well had I been spelling Tokamak properly I would have found it instantly :D The information on the Projects for Fusion from Tokamaks are at http://fusion.org.uk. Specifically the History at http://www.fusion.org.uk/start/index.html which is quite informative. There is also a bit about the huge new one they were only considering in the program I watched here http://www.fusion.org.uk/mast/index.html.

Giancarlo said:
Going by this argument, gasoline cars are electric cars too. But that's merely bullshit.
I think the point there was that the Petrol moves the Car in a Petrol Car... the Electricity moves the Car in a Hydrogen Car. That is why a Petrol Car is not an Electric Car :D
 
Lord Kalthorn said:
Haha! Well had I been spelling Tokamak properly I would have found it instantly :D The information on the Projects for Fusion from Tokamaks are at http://fusion.org.uk. Specifically the History at http://www.fusion.org.uk/start/index.html which is quite informative. There is also a bit about the huge new one they were only considering in the program I watched here http://www.fusion.org.uk/mast/index.html.

All one source eh? That's like pointing me to a UFO website... you need to provide more then one source that corroborates the claims. Sorry dude.

I think the point there was that the Petrol moves the Car in a Petrol Car... the Electricity moves the Car in a Hydrogen Car. That is why a Petrol Car is not an Electric Car :D

Actually hydrogen moves the hydrogen car, not electricity.
 
Giancarlo said:
All one source eh? That's like pointing me to a UFO website... you need to provide more then one source that corroborates the claims. Sorry dude.
Haha; well then take into account http://www.pppl.gov/projects/pages/tftr.html :D

Giancarlo said:
Actually hydrogen moves the hydrogen car, not electricity.
Well I don't know what Hydrogen Cars you're talking about - but by all means I'm up for seeing it.
 
Giancarlo said:
I say we cancel it and put it towards more useful energy.
Haha. What could be more usefull than renewable, completely safe energy with cheap equipment with long lifespans, easy decommisioning and more power than a Nuclear Power Plant pushes out?

Giancarlo said:
I'm talking about virtually all. Again dude, you need to grow up and understand you can't win in any debate.
Well I'm still intrigued by this Hydrogen Combustion Engine if indeed the Hydrogens Moves the Car in virtually all of them :D I can see why you think its dreadfully dangerous if you think that...
 
Lord Kalthorn said:
Haha. What could be more usefull than renewable, completely safe energy with cheap equipment with long lifespans, easy decommisioning and more power than a Nuclear Power Plant pushes out?

I don't think this can put out more energy then nuclear power.

Well I'm still intrigued by this Hydrogen Combustion Engine if indeed the Hydrogens Moves the Car in virtually all of them :D I can see why you think its dreadfully dangerous if you think that...

Well hydrogen itself is dangerous according to the US government, my chemistry professor who has a PhD, and several reputable scientists. I take their word over that of some brat on a forum.
 
Giancarlo said:
I don't think this can put out more energy then nuclear power.

Well nuclear power is ok, just as long as regulations are followed. No one wants another Three Mile Island.
 
Giancarlo said:
I don't think this can put out more energy then nuclear power.

Well hydrogen itself is dangerous according to the US government, my chemistry professor who has a PhD, and several reputable scientists. I take their word over that of some brat on a forum.
Haha; well I thought you were better at Chemestry than me? :D Nuclear Fission is a dangerous but easy perversion of Nuclear Fusion; Fusion has always and will always be capable of making far more power from less energy and money. It purely uses Water, the equipment required to create the effect, and energy to start it off. Even now they have it on the brink of Nuclear Levels. Its what powers the sun if you can remmember that far back to your Physics Classes :D The only limit to how much power it can produce is the point to which is collapses in on itself.

Hydrogen is Dangerous in a Combustion Engine! Of course it is :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom