Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
I'm not sure what Benchmarks you're looking at but they're not those I have seen. It would be interesting to see a link?
Benchmarks on DirectX 9.0
I presume from the RAM you're after Games so while I dislike that the AMDs have the top stops for one of the few times they get it it does show the Celeron D 2.8 (lower versions of the D aren't on here) beats the Sempron by a few points of a Frame Per Second - pretty useless it has to be said but the rest of the benchmarks show the same story in greater clarity with larger margins. Here. In the DivX encoding the Celeron D 2.8 comes out 30 seconds faster than the Sempron 3000+. I do also like, not directly effecting this point but how a 2.4Ghz Intel Northwood beats an FX-55 Clawhammer High End Processor in the SiSoft Sandra Whetstone CPU Bench.
And its not as if you cannot overclock a Celeron D If you're into that kind of cheating scummery.
Benchmarks on DirectX 9.0
I presume from the RAM you're after Games so while I dislike that the AMDs have the top stops for one of the few times they get it it does show the Celeron D 2.8 (lower versions of the D aren't on here) beats the Sempron by a few points of a Frame Per Second - pretty useless it has to be said but the rest of the benchmarks show the same story in greater clarity with larger margins. Here. In the DivX encoding the Celeron D 2.8 comes out 30 seconds faster than the Sempron 3000+. I do also like, not directly effecting this point but how a 2.4Ghz Intel Northwood beats an FX-55 Clawhammer High End Processor in the SiSoft Sandra Whetstone CPU Bench.
And its not as if you cannot overclock a Celeron D If you're into that kind of cheating scummery.