Gian, read Delta's Post. What he's meaning is that the Cyrix 3 can, which is perfectly correct, do somthing Intel and AMD cant - Run without any cooling hardware - because at maxium output they run at 7watts.
Now, that even makes the Athlon 64 look like a volcanoe.
I'm guessing he would use a C3 for something that has to be silent and cool. I'm going to be using a dual mini ITX motherboard and 2 C3 CPU's built into a car radio case. along with a slot loading DVD Drive and Laptop HDD for a car media system. I couldn't use an AMD or an Intel CPU for that.
Another thing, Did you check out the last link I posted up? As for which CPU is best, I have looked at the new benchmarks and found that AMD does not knock it out cold, but more neck and neck, with intel leading with the video encoding, and AMD with the games.
I'll get it, and someone can compare - Anyone got a A64 3000+ and will do benchmarks with me? no overclocking of any sort allowed.
Also, I don't dissagree that the AMD CPU is a great CPU, I just think that as far as future profing goes, they may not be as good as the P4 6xx series. Although they are both 64bit, the Winchestor cores only have 512KB cache, while the P4 6xx has 2MB. I think in a couple of years time, when software starts comming out that tax's both these CPU, and athlough this extra cache does little for the P4 the now, differences such as this will have a profound hit on performance - i.e. I think AMD's 512KB of cache will kill it with tommorrows software, 64bit code can only be bigger. Same goes for SSE3 and hyperthreading support. Look at my sig, I'm not one for upgrading all the time, hence I would personally go with the P4 6xx CPU this time. As you could gather from the GFX card I use in my main rig, I don't do gaming very much, so think about it - The P4 would be better for me, as I reckon me and it could have a good 2-3 year relationship.
Man, I gotta say, this forum grew 4 pages, in a nights sleep! well, in order to be cool, I gotta do it to, Pawned! - all of ya!
....hehe