Intel Pentium 6xx or AMD Athlon 64 skt 939 Winchester?

[V1RU51]

hmm

I'd go for the Winchester 12 guage.

 

[Giancarlo]

get ready for the rush of AMD supporters who are blinded by the athlon64 processors and arent even gunna check out the 6xx series. your in for a shitstorm hope you got your umbrella. i dont know anything aboutt eh new 6xx series so ima going to keep my nose outta this

What a pile of dung... I'm tired of you intel fanboys. You make up these numbers and you defy benchmarks. The Athlon 64 defeats the Pentium 6xx in 70-80% of the tests. I'm not going to check out the 6xx because it is false advertisement and a waste of time. It is not 64-bit. The 6xx is an expensive joke. Additionally overclocking potential amongst these new Pentiums is limited because of the high level of heat they generate. I would recommend you steer clear from this false advertisement ploy. Intel has no personal 64-bit processors out. Itanium are server CPUs. These aren't 64-bit. They support some 64-bit applications but that is very limited.

 

[jack22]

iT IS Called EM64 Gian, read up on it before you make false accsations.

 

[Giancarlo]

make false accusations? I didn't make any false accusations, jacky.

 

[jack22]

Name calling? And you are too stubborn to read up on EM64 which is what they are advertising when you click the ad and read the smaller print.

 

[Giancarlo]

You are the one who isn't reading. I was simply stating that the Pentium 6xx is not a 64-bit processor. They are committing advertisement falsehoods as far as I'm concerned.

 

[jack22]

Then you are not educated enough t say that because it never said processor, just processing. Loophole, yes. False advertising, no. Read before arguing.

 

[Giancarlo]

Not educated enough? I'm far more educated then you. It is false advertising.

 

[jack22]

Then go sue them if you so strongly beileve it i. You will get pwned in 2 seconds if you try.

 

[Giancarlo]

You are the one getting PWNED by everything I say.