STOP SAYING RANDOM STATEMENTS AND FLAMING!
First of all, intel is a "reliable" processor for multitasking, although the AMD can multitask as good or better than intel, we will ignore that. AMD has a fsb of 1600-2000mhz, intel has a Top of 1066 in there 800 dollar cpu. AMD has been proved over and over again to be better at gaming, do not argue this. Intel is running 3.8 ghz at 32-bit and AMD is running 2.6 at 64-bit, so they can't really be compared. Its like comparing a runner (intel) to a bicycler(AMD) in terms of speed. They are on the same scale, adn AMD is still beating INtel ON an OS not even using the processor to its full potential, so intel is the overall loser, although it "may" have some strengths
First of all, intel is a "reliable" processor for multitasking, although the AMD can multitask as good or better than intel, we will ignore that. AMD has a fsb of 1600-2000mhz, intel has a Top of 1066 in there 800 dollar cpu. AMD has been proved over and over again to be better at gaming, do not argue this. Intel is running 3.8 ghz at 32-bit and AMD is running 2.6 at 64-bit, so they can't really be compared. Its like comparing a runner (intel) to a bicycler(AMD) in terms of speed. They are on the same scale, adn AMD is still beating INtel ON an OS not even using the processor to its full potential, so intel is the overall loser, although it "may" have some strengths
