Giancarlo said:Evidence is PC Magazine.. furthermore my arguments can't be flawed. Not ever.
Well thats all i need to hear to know you're an idiot.
Giancarlo said:Evidence is PC Magazine.. furthermore my arguments can't be flawed. Not ever.
Well thats all i need to hear to know you're an idiot.
Tokinbudz said:Yes those 14 people could have been anyone. Such as readers of that site who all seem to disagree that Norton is as great as the site says it is. Dont forget its people like that who are most commonly using those security systems. That much negative feedback from so many people and you still think youre sooo right. Open your eyes.
root said:I've been smashed because you posted one link...
even that link says that norton is the most resource hungry virus scanner...
neh, if anyone has been smashed it you whatt with the 6 review links that have been posted this morning...
6 unique sources are better than one unique source.
But they weren't, they were by individual posters,Giancarlo said:These all could of been the same person. I don't take user reviews with much credibility...
Aggreed, sexual preference has nothing to do with computing ability or knowledge...Giancarlo said:And stop attacking other peoples sexuality because you find it fun.
root said:But they weren't, they were by individual posters,
if the case was otherwise the duplicate accounts would have been removed by now!
My point -AVG / NOD32 / AVAST is better in this respect because it places no resource prerequisits, and no noticable slowdown.Giancarlo said:Dude, for the last time... it says Norton isn't that bad for someone with a good machine and I got it.
Apparantly user reviews are not credible and do not count...Besides, I notice the corporate edition is really compact and uses very little in the way of resources.
Well yes I do like to get smashed...You have been smashed. Totally. That's the way of root. Being smashed everyday.
Tokinbudz said:Stfu with your lame "smashing". A lot more then 14 people when you look at all the other likes with negative feedback. Oh by the way, notice your lame ass hasnt found any negative feedback or reviews about Mcafee????? I see lots for Norton but none for Mcafee. Hmmmmmmm. What the hell do you base your smashing off of. A magazine review? Find me some negative stuff on Mcafee and until you do youve smashed nobody and youre debating skills are very weak.
root said:My point -AVG / NOD32 / AVAST is better in this respect because it places no resource prerequisits, and no noticable slowdown.
Well yes I do like to get smashed...
but as far as this argument goes you are loosing pathetically and the saddest thing is you don't even realise it.