AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
What a selective fool.. he keeps posting tests that Intel do win. I never said Intel didn't win any. But he's posting the 20% of tests that Intel does win.
 
"The Athlon64 FX's integrated memory controller repeatedly showed off its strengths. Whenever users want to play 3D games (Comanche, Serious Sam, Splinter Cell, Unreal Tournament 2003, Wolfenstein Enemy Territory, and X2), the Pentium 4 Extreme Edition is only runner-up. Also, the FX holds a sizeable lead when it comes to data compression with WinRAR, compilation of a C++ project with Visual Studio.net and Mathematica. Even during testing at high clock rates, these strengths were quite obvious."

http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040419/cpu-scaling-22.html
 
you are the biased mofo.. you just don't fucking get it do you? AMD 64 is the better CPU by far. Get it through your thick-ass head.
 
On the other hand, we should also point out the advantages of the Pentium 4 EE. Even though it cannot keep pace with the measured memory performance of the FX, there are many applications that benefit from a large cache, the high clock rate, and, especially, from Hyper Threading: 3D Studio Max, Cinema 4D, Cool Edit Pro, XMPEG with DivX, MainConcept MPEG Encoder, TMPGEnc, SYSmark 2004 and Microsoft's Movie Maker.

The bottom line? We need to delay the final verdict as to which of the processor strategies is better in the long term. We just can't determine a clear-cut winner at this point. At increasing clock rates, both processors offer additional potential.
 
jack22 said:
On the other hand, we should also point out the advantages of the Pentium 4 EE. Even though it cannot keep pace with the measured memory performance of the FX, there are many applications that benefit from a large cache, the high clock rate, and, especially, from Hyper Threading: 3D Studio Max, Cinema 4D, Cool Edit Pro, XMPEG with DivX, MainConcept MPEG Encoder, TMPGEnc, SYSmark 2004 and Microsoft's Movie Maker.

The bottom line? We need to delay the final verdict as to which of the processor strategies is better in the long term. We just can't determine a clear-cut winner at this point. At increasing clock rates, both processors offer additional potential.

Tomshardware is just avoiding giving the medal to AMD 64 which deserves it because it has the footing in the future and has more pluses to it, while the Intel marginally leads in some media tests. Again, you must stop being a fool.
 
jack22 said:
You must have a fetish with AMD, you have a stupid answer for everyhting.

You are the one with stupid answers for everything. You have stupid answers, a stupid face, and two stupid feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom