Why would it need to be shut down? How do people in Open Source shut companies down if they're all free What is impressive is how people know what to do; even if its their first computer they know what to do. Its intuitive. That's what a GUI, for most people, has to do.
No, the company started out as a real coorperation, but they decided to break up, because software like that should be free (though even I would admit I wouldn't mind paying 10 or 20 bucks for a GUI like that).
The moment you put even Visual Studio on on its own; Winamp plays up either because my PC is not fast enough (which, for a media player, it isn't going to be) or because Winamp is highly inefficient. Or because its not simple enough? Eitherway - it is slow.
Winamp... is slow? Really?
MSN Explorer has no bugs; there just aren't any (obviously, there are technically, but there are no updates or patches for it and no security alerts) even Firefox doesn't have that. It doesn't have a vast section of the market it has to be said - but things like Safari and Opera have around that level of share; and they have Bugs and Patches. If I were Microsoft; MSN doesn't make much money anyway and the Explorer is merely a part of the paid service - I'd update MSN Explorer for Longhorn and ship it as Internet Explorer 7 to stop the Anti-Trust people thinking its Microsoft pushing MSN onto people. People do say the ony way to fix Internet Explorer is to rebuild it - that's the most efficient way.
Blah blah blah, they should just do everyone a favor and admit that IE is shit compared to mozilla, and tell them that if they want a "safer" internet, they should just switch. Now THAT would be what you call care for customers.
And you still haven't justified why their software costs so fucking much.
Nah; using honourable weapons does not represent a need to kill somebody; and it does not say killing in itself is honour either. The honourable weapon is that which makes killing; when it is required for honour (protecting people, protecting a country, protecting an honour) honourable. Machines Guns don't do this because they require no skill, no training, you point and one hits eventually. Swords of course are the best ones; any type generally bar daggers. Any kind of weapon on a stick or chain (Mace, Lance...) and of course - if you want a gun - Cannons suffice because they're so damned hard to use train for and gain the skill to use to your advantage (not just to break your shoulder).
You're right about machine guns, but killing people is still not honorable. Hand to hand fighting is what everyone should do. Killing people is not right anyways, so their is no honorable weapon. They're all just peace enforcing tools, not something we should praise.
I love my Asus motherboard, compatible with everything :>