Giancarlo said:
You're supposed to be doing Politics at University! Thats a very blunt debating point? Simple fact is; for overclocking processors the Intel EEs have proven themselves, in the hands of as I said the only honourable Overclockers to be the best for it. Reaching speeds of 5Ghz, and above an increasing amount of times.
Giancarlo said:
No it isn't. Intel is about 1-2 years away.
Again dreadfully blunt. We both know AMD and Intel are bringing out their Dual Core Processors in 2005. When AMD are, I do not know, probably mid 2005 however for Intel it will be at least before the end of the year - which is less than a Year from now.
Xbit Labs specifically says, a few times in the article.
Specifically in the article: '..."2005 will be a great year for Intel†because dual-core chips “are great for customersâ€...'
Giancarlo said:
You're an idiot. Full stop. Complete baffoon. AMD64s have more then that. You need to read up on the facts and stop being such a stupid Intel fan boy. Intel is going down.
AMD, even FX-55s, have more than 1Meg Cache?
You are so funny:
Computing HQ, the first place I found in the search specifically says the FX-55 - the best processor apparently - has only 1Meg Cache.
Giancarlo said:
Can we say idiot? Sempron.
They're not Processors, they're Budget Processors. If you want to include Sempron we can include Celeron Ds.
In fact; as I just noticed I said: '...AMD will have two processors; Intel will have four virutally in context...'. You for some reason thought I meant Processor lines; and I missed it completely. That is about the difference between Hyperthreading and to point out how when Dual Processors come out, Intel will have four processors in two, AMD will have two in two. Hyperthreading will come into its own here - as although games for 1 processor work almost worse on 2 processors like the HT Pentiums; games writen for 2 processors, which they will be, will work better on 4 processors like the Dual HT Pentiums.
That is what I meant.
Giancarlo said:
Intel is going suffer huge losses and is continuing to do so. Read up on business aspects of this. That's what I do. No serious growth loss? There you show your ignorance again. Intel is shit. They will continue to be shit and will always be shit. That's all I will say on them.
Intel Earnings up That sounds like a company loosing great masses of Market share; a company which is shit and will always be shit, and a company which is continuing to suffer huge looses.
