Worlds fastest Processor avaliable to buy
- Thread starter AMR1000
- Start date
- Status
Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
Then AMD's first and most high held becon for their users are merely over bragging rights? 
That's not a good sign.
That's not a good sign.
Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
Intel users enjoy bragging about their clockspeeds?
If AMD Users don't enjoy this at least as much, if not more because of the fact they seem to enjoy overclocking than Intel Users then it would be quite surprising that AMD Users don't generally talk about their clockspeed - rather the Intel numbered equivilent 3200, 3400, 3600. Unless they are discussing how they have overclocked it. In which case they still point out the Intel equivilent number from their new clockspeed...
I have heard no Intel User bragging of their clockspeed unless it is deserved - the big ones like 3.8Ghz, 4Ghz, 5Ghz - the people who have done some great things with their processors. AMD users however, will often brag needlessly of their clockspeed (3200 @ 2.6Ghz) for instance. Even people who have processors which are useless will brag about how their 2000s are at 1.8Ghz or 2Ghz.
Saying Intel Users brag about their clockspeeds is the silly thing
If AMD Users don't enjoy this at least as much, if not more because of the fact they seem to enjoy overclocking than Intel Users then it would be quite surprising that AMD Users don't generally talk about their clockspeed - rather the Intel numbered equivilent 3200, 3400, 3600. Unless they are discussing how they have overclocked it. In which case they still point out the Intel equivilent number from their new clockspeed...
I have heard no Intel User bragging of their clockspeed unless it is deserved - the big ones like 3.8Ghz, 4Ghz, 5Ghz - the people who have done some great things with their processors. AMD users however, will often brag needlessly of their clockspeed (3200 @ 2.6Ghz) for instance. Even people who have processors which are useless will brag about how their 2000s are at 1.8Ghz or 2Ghz.
Saying Intel Users brag about their clockspeeds is the silly thing
Lord Kalthorn said:
The LK ignorance continues and contiunes and continues and continues.. nothing can stop it. It is like that damn little pink bunny on the energizer commericals.. it never stops. It keeps going and going, yet it provides no facts and is mindless.
I have my processor overclocked quite a bit. But I'm not bragging and most people don't brag, you brainless numbskull.
Saying Intel Users brag about their clockspeeds is the silly thing
Intel users are losers.
Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
'Athlon 64 2800+ oc'ed to 2.4 Ghz ohhhh yeaaaaa'
'AMD Athlon 64 3400+ "ClawHammer" OC'ed to 2.42'
And that's only a few; can you find even two people here that are bragging about their Intel's Clockspeed with such zest?
'AMD Athlon 64 3400+ "ClawHammer" OC'ed to 2.42'
And that's only a few; can you find even two people here that are bragging about their Intel's Clockspeed with such zest?
Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
You said Bragging Rights - there's nothing wrong with bragging. You made out there wasGiancarlo said:
Lord Kalthorn
Guru
- Messages
- 13,293
- Location
- Britain
For Instance:
My Chicken has more feathers
My Frogs are bigger
My Doves are more white
Your Doves are less white
I have Turtles...
that sort of stuff. All reasonable and truthful comments were I to actually have a Chicken, a Frog, Doves, and Turtles.
So then... have you actually found any FX-55 vs. any Intel 3.8-4.0 Style Chip yet then?
My Chicken has more feathers
My Frogs are bigger
My Doves are more white
Your Doves are less white
I have Turtles...
that sort of stuff. All reasonable and truthful comments were I to actually have a Chicken, a Frog, Doves, and Turtles.
So then... have you actually found any FX-55 vs. any Intel 3.8-4.0 Style Chip yet then?
- Status
Similar threads
