Lord Kalthorn said:Then AMD's first and most high held becon for their users are merely over bragging rights? That's not a good sign.
Lord Kalthorn said:Intel users enjoy bragging about their clockspeeds?
If AMD Users don't enjoy this at least as much, if not more because of the fact they seem to enjoy overclocking than Intel Users then it would be quite surprising that AMD Users don't generally talk about their clockspeed - rather the Intel numbered equivilent 3200, 3400, 3600. Unless they are discussing how they have overclocked it. In which case they still point out the Intel equivilent number from their new clockspeed...
AMD users however, will often brag needlessly of their clockspeed (3200 @ 2.6Ghz) for instance. Even people who have processors which are useless will brag about how their 2000s are at 1.8Ghz or 2Ghz.
Saying Intel Users brag about their clockspeeds is the silly thing
Lord Kalthorn said:'Athlon 64 2800+ oc'ed to 2.4 Ghz ohhhh yeaaaaa'
'AMD Athlon 64 3400+ "ClawHammer" OC'ed to 2.42'
And that's only a few; can you find even two people here that are bragging about their Intel's Clockspeed with such zest?
You said Bragging Rights - there's nothing wrong with bragging. You made out there wasGiancarlo said:Bragging rights. Just like more watts in speakers doesn't mean crap. We all know it depends on how the speakers are built.
Lord Kalthorn said:You said Bragging Rights - there's nothing wrong with bragging. You made out there was