callarse1 said:The point I was making is that the person to file the US Supreme Court case was Bush and not Gore because his name comes first in the suit, Bush V. Gore.
DUDE, that was not the first case that was made in 2000. In the Florida Supreme Court it was Gore, and Bush appealed to the US Supreme Court.
I agree with you here, but I was describing how we have writing from our founding fathers that says states have the right to govern the elections. Whether they wanted to count them once, twice, or hundred times is their progative. The point you avoid is that Bush Senior knew people from the Supreme court.
Bush senior knew people from the Supreme Court? Every president has to know who is on the Supreme Court. It doesn't matter if one knows somebody on the Supreme Court. Right now the only justice I have a big problem with is Scalia.
Considering Bush' record as governor in Texas it is reasonable that he did not have daily briefings. Yea I know that he has people under him but he is the person in charge. Example: Your boss at work is on vacation for two months do you work (a) the same, (b) slower, or (c) faster. The answer is obvious.
You again don't know what you are talking about. You talk without evidence. You're a fool at best. John Kerry missed 70% of the votes in the Senate last year. Cheney on the other hand was at each of them.
Evidently the government does not know how to function. Security should be a priority. I said they should do it, but I never said they had the resources to do it. They should have many committees in the CIA/FBA looking into these threats.
You're a fool. The government does know how to function. It cannot look through each threat just as it cannot protect every mile of its border. It just isn't feasible. It would be far too expensive. You don't know anything. FBA? What the heck is the FBA? FBI you mean. Neither have enough man power to look at everything. The FBI not to mention has to monitor domestic terrorists.
By the way I don't know why you decided to bring up about Pearl Harbor. Many historian describe that the president purposely ignored that information about Pearl Harbor because he wanted the USA to go to war. At that time he knew that the people did not want to go to war so now the people would have a reason to go to war.
It has to do with the facts. Many historians DO NOT SAY that. You're full of crap. The US did not ignore anything. There was so much intel from mainland China there was not enough time. You don't know what you are talking about.
Another question to ponder does this sound like what Bush did? Did he purprosely ignore the intelligence so he could go to Iraq?
Again you demonstrate your idiocy.
Why would you greet them? Anyone? Cos of oil, oil = money. There relationship is a two way street with transations of money, oil and power. To say that they don't get money from them is an understatment.
Oh please. This had nothing to do with oil.