I don't see what the problem is, your posts were much more directly ofensive than Blutos, he gave some bad advice, and responded to your insults and flames. how can you hold that aganist him, have you never heard of justice?
You do understand that the prinicpals of justice is fair trial, you don't give Bluto, or anyone who compares you to him the tmie of day.
As I said justice is based on a fair trial, not on who can shout the loudest or start the most threads.
Thereason people defended him was because of how badly you were acting at the time, it wasn't a defence of him, it was a comparisson of your words/actions against his.
I have to say I agree with tommyboy, you really should just let this lie down now, there is no sense in constatnyl dragging up the same old ideas. Bluto has ben banned, albeit temporarily, so you got the justice you wanted.
LK, you really need to figure out how to lock threads!...
third time lucky?
You do understand that the prinicpals of justice is fair trial, you don't give Bluto, or anyone who compares you to him the tmie of day.
As I said justice is based on a fair trial, not on who can shout the loudest or start the most threads.
Thereason people defended him was because of how badly you were acting at the time, it wasn't a defence of him, it was a comparisson of your words/actions against his.
I have to say I agree with tommyboy, you really should just let this lie down now, there is no sense in constatnyl dragging up the same old ideas. Bluto has ben banned, albeit temporarily, so you got the justice you wanted.
LK, you really need to figure out how to lock threads!...
third time lucky?
